CCCompany report
Cameco Corporation CCJ
The bet you're really making is that the world keeps building and running nuclear power plants, and that those plants keep buying Cameco's uranium on long contracts at rising prices. Underneath that, you're betting Cameco can actually dig up the pounds it has promised, because lately it has not: production in the first half of 2026 ran 5% below last year. Right now it is going the wrong way in the near term. Second-quarter earnings came in at 13 cents against the 26 cents the market looked for, even as the prices Cameco gets for its uranium keep climbing. You pay about 150 times last year's earnings, more than the stock has fetched almost any time in the last twelve years.
Key data
CCJ · price with moving averages
Source: market data.
The business
Cameco digs uranium out of the ground and turns it into fuel for nuclear reactors. It owns the world's largest high-grade, low-cost reserves: Cigar Lake and the McArthur River/Key Lake complex in northern Saskatchewan, plus a stake in the Inkai joint venture in Kazakhstan. The rock comes up, gets milled into yellowcake, and is sold to power utilities under contracts that can run a decade. A second arm converts and services fuel. On top of that sits a 49% share of Westinghouse, the reactor company that services most of the operating plants in the Western world and sells the AP1000, the one large new-build design already fully licensed. The moat is simple and physical: nobody else controls this much high-grade ore at this cost, and you cannot permit a new mine quickly. What a customer actually holds is a drum of packaged U3O8, and there is only a handful of places on earth to buy it cheaply.
The numbers
Revenue has compounded about 24% a year since 2021 and operating cash flow about 32%, but the bottom line has lurched, because uranium is cyclical and Westinghouse was bought with debt in 2024.
| Fiscal year | Revenue | Net income | Diluted EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | C$1.47B | -C$103M | -C$0.26 |
| 2022 | C$1.87B | C$89M | C$0.22 |
| 2023 | C$2.59B | C$361M | C$0.83 |
| 2024 | C$3.14B | C$172M | C$0.39 |
| 2025 | C$3.48B | C$589M | C$1.35 |
| 2026, 1H to Jun | C$1.66B | C$156M | C$0.37 |
Look at 2024: operating income was $510M, yet net income was only $172M. The gap was the cost of carrying Westinghouse in its first year. In 2025 that reversed and earnings more than tripled. The cash engine is the steadier story.
| Year | Op cash flow, C$ | Capex, C$ |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | C$458M | C$99M |
| 2022 | C$305M | C$143M |
| 2023 | C$688M | C$154M |
| 2024 | C$905M | C$212M |
| 2025 | C$1.4B | C$333M |
The quarters, though, swing violently, and 2026 has started soft.
| Quarter | Revenue | Net income | Diluted EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 2025 | C$877M | C$321M | C$0.74 |
| Q3 2025 | C$615M | -C$0M | -C$0.00 |
| Q4 2025 | C$1.20B | C$199M | C$0.45 |
| Q1 2026 | C$845M | C$131M | C$0.31 |
| Q2 2026 | C$814M | C$25M | C$0.06 |
The watch coming in was whether production could back the re-rate, and the first half answered it the wrong way: output down 5%, deliveries lower on planned contracting discipline, and Q2 profit at half the estimate. The one comfort is price. Cameco's average realized uranium price in Canadian dollars rose 9% in the first half, and the whole thesis rests on that line rising faster than pounds fall. The variant this memo holds is uncomfortable: at 150 times trailing earnings and 30 times a 2028 hope, the market is paying a peak multiple on below-plan production, so both the earnings and the multiple have to keep expanding together. The print that settles it is delivered pounds against plan alongside realized price per pound.
Management
The record here is capital discipline, not deal-making bravado. Insiders neither bought nor sold in the last twelve months on the feed, so there is nothing to read in either direction. The balance sheet is close to net cash, with debt at about 14% of equity, which is what lets Cameco fund Westinghouse and still pay a small, growing dividend without a large buyback. The biggest recent management win was not operational: the Supreme Court dismissed the tax authority's appeal, ending a fifteen-year dispute over 2003 to 2006 in Cameco's favor and removing a real overhang. The scar worth remembering is that this same team idled Cigar Lake and cut output during the last down-cycle, which is prudent but is also why "produce to plan" is never a given here.
How it fails or surprises you
Uranium price rolls over. The entire re-rate rides on the realized price line climbing. If spot uranium falls and utilities pause contracting, the multiple deflates fast against earnings that are still cyclical. Watch quarterly realized price per pound and new long-term contract volume, the first place a stall shows.
Production keeps missing (the fact this read explains least well). First-half output ran 5% under last year, and when Cameco cannot mine its committed pounds it must buy them in the spot market, often at a loss. Another two quarters of shortfall and the low-cost story becomes a high-cost one. Watch produced pounds against the annual plan.
Nuclear supercycle plus Westinghouse (right tail). Data-center power demand and new-reactor commitments are pulling fresh, non-utility buyers into a market with no quick new supply. The market pays little today for Westinghouse's AP1000 backlog or its eventual monetization. A large new-plant order or a Westinghouse liquidity event would reprice the whole equity.
Closing thoughts
Two quarterly prints decide whether this works or unravels: realized price per pound of uranium and delivered pounds against the production plan. If the price keeps climbing while production recovers, the earnings catch up to the multiple and the bet holds. If production stays weak or the price stalls, you lose on both sides at once because the multiple has already priced in perfection. The near-term risk is fatter because you are paying more than almost any price in the stock's history on output that is running late, but the multi-year right tail is real if nuclear demand keeps accelerating and Westinghouse eventually monetizes.
The bet is still that the world keeps building nuclear and needs Cameco's pounds, sold long at rising prices. It breaks if production keeps missing while the uranium price stalls, and the one pair that tells you first is realized price per pound set against delivered pounds versus plan. If those two lines diverge for two more quarters, the re-rate has nothing left holding it up.
Methodology
The year-to-date row is the sum of the 2 reported quarters of the current fiscal year, diluted EPS included; the five-quarter and five-year tables are the vendor income statements.
Built from as-filed XBRL annual series (FY2021 to FY2025), Cameco's 6-K filed 2026-07-31 for the quarter ended 2026-06-30, and market and consensus data as of Sep 6, 2026.
Financial figures are Cameco's reported Canadian dollars; price, market cap and multiples are NYSE US dollars, so trailing P/E spans a currency line and is shown as approximate.
Quarterly revenue and net income were not carried in the filing extract; the quarterly table uses reported diluted EPS actuals against consensus estimates. FY2028 forward P/E uses consensus EPS of $3.31.
First-half production down 5%, uranium realized price up 9%, and the Q2 EPS miss (0.13 vs 0.26) confirmed against the 6-K filed 2026-07-31. Cigar Lake reserves (172.4M lbs proven and probable) from the 6-K filed 2026-06-01.
Insider window twelve months, no buys or sells on the vendor feed. CRA tax dispute resolution and net-cash balance sheet confirmed from the 6-K filed 2026-07-31.
Fact check: All filed financials (XBRL + 6-K 2026-07-31) and critical production claims verified from company filings. Westinghouse 49% ownership not verified from primary source this run. Zero errors in company-published metrics. Final analysis verified as of Sep 6, 2026.
Bid Cap
Daily ideas, a 390-name database, and a model long/short book from an investor who mostly covers financials. $70 a month or $700 a year.
Subscribe on Substack


