MFCompany report
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. MFG
The bet you're really making is that Japan is done with zero interest rates for good, and that Mizuho, one of the country's three giant banks, keeps earning more on its loans than it pays to hold its deposits as rates climb. You're betting that gap widens rather than settling back, and that Japanese savers stay slow to demand more for their cash. Right now it is going well: the gap grew to 1.27% from 1.04% a year earlier, and problem loans actually shrank. You pay about 1.9 times the bank's net worth, more than the stock has cost in at least twelve years.
Key data
MFG · price with moving averages
Source: market data.
The business
Mizuho Financial Group is one of Japan's three megabanks, alongside Mitsubishi UFJ and Sumitomo Mitsui. It takes deposits from households and companies across Japan, lends to the country's largest corporations, and runs a trust bank, a securities dealer and an asset manager on top. The engine underneath everything is a deposit base of ¥61.6 trillion (as of June 2026) that, through two decades of zero and negative rates, earned the bank almost nothing. Depositors left their money because moving it bought them nothing either. Now the Bank of Japan is lifting rates for the first time in a generation, and that mountain of cheap, patient money finally earns a spread. That is the moat in one line: scale plus depositor inertia at one of three names the country trusts with its savings. Set against it, about a third of revenue comes from markets and fees that swing with the cycle, plus a large global corporate and investment bank that competes on price far from home. The saver getting paid on a deposit for the first time in twenty years is the whole story.
The numbers
For years the interest Mizuho kept after funding costs barely moved. Then it jumped.
| Fiscal year | Revenue | Net income | Diluted EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2022 | $2835.0B | $530.5B | $41.85 |
| FY2023 | $4887.7B | $555.5B | $43.84 |
| FY2024 | $7856.0B | $679.0B | $53.58 |
| FY2025 | $8600.2B | $885.4B | $70.04 |
| FY2026 | $9490.3B | $1323.9B | $107.05 |
| FY2027, 3M to Jun | $2358.3B | $428.5B | $35.52 |
Net interest income crept near ¥1.2 trillion for years, then rose 34% in the year to March 2026 as the loan book repriced upward faster than deposits. That single inflection is the entire re-rate. The live proof sits in the June quarter.
| Q1 (three months) | FY3/27 | FY3/26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Return on loans | 1.60% | 1.21% | +0.38 |
| Cost of deposits | 0.32% | 0.17% | +0.15 |
| Loan-deposit spread | 1.27% | 1.04% | +0.23 |
The loan-deposit spread widened to 1.27% from 1.04%. What Mizuho earns on loans rose 38 basis points, what it pays on deposits rose only 15. The spread is expanding because savers have barely begun to ask for more. That lag is the case for owning it and the clock at once, because deposit costs catch up eventually.
Credit is quiet. The reserve line is not.
| Credit | Latest | Prior |
|---|---|---|
| NPL ratio (Jun / Mar 26) | 0.70% | 0.80% |
| Provision for losses (FY26 / FY25) | ¥188.4B | ¥95.9B |
| Net loans (Jun / Mar 26) | ¥99.8T | ¥103.1T |
Bad loans fell to 0.70% of the book, yet the money set aside for losses nearly doubled to ¥188 billion. Reserves are being built ahead of any visible stress, prudent against a bigger, repricing book, and worth watching if it turns out to be early recognition instead. Reported profit reached about ¥1.16 trillion, on a vendor basis that runs above the company's own profit-attributable figure. What this memo doubts that the tape does not: the spread is closer to its peak than its start, because loan yields have already moved and deposit costs have not. The print that settles it is next quarter's two deltas, side by side.
Management
No insider bought or sold a share in the open market over the past year, which is normal for a Japanese issuer and carries no signal, so read the capital account instead. Buybacks were the loud move: about ¥404 billion repurchased in the year to March 2026, four times the prior year, with repurchased stock cancelled outright, and the monthly filings show the program still running. That is real capital return, but it was done with the stock at roughly 1.9 times tangible book, the richest it has been in over a decade, a strange price at which to be the most aggressive buyer. Much of the firepower comes from unwinding Japan's old cross-shareholdings, selling stakes held for relationship reasons and handing the proceeds back. Equity still compounded to ¥10.9 trillion, and the ADR earnings have come in above the consensus estimate four quarters running. The judgment to weigh: aggressive return, bought dear.
How it fails or surprises you
The margin plateaus (downside). The whole 1.9x book rests on the spread widening. If the next loan-deposit print lands flat near 1.27% while cost of deposits keeps climbing 15 basis points a quarter and loan yields stall, the spread has peaked and a top-of-range multiple has nothing left to discount. Watch the two deltas: the quarter loan yields stop outrunning deposit costs is the quarter the story changes.
The reserve is a warning, not prudence (downside). Credit costs nearly doubled to ¥188 billion while bad loans fell. If that is early recognition of stress in a fast-repricing loan book or in the global corporate arm rather than conservatism, charge-offs follow the provision. Watch the NPL ratio turning back above 0.80% and the provision run-rate climbing a second year.
Savers stay asleep (right tail). Deposit costs rose only 15 basis points against 38 on loans, so the deposit beta is still tiny. If Japanese households stay inert through the next two hikes, the spread widens further than a plateau assumes and cross-shareholding sales keep fuelling buybacks. The market prices a peak. A second year of 20-basis-point spread gains is not in the 1.9x. Watch cost of deposits holding under about 0.5%.
Closing thoughts
This is a setup one print resolves, and the print is the quarterly pair of loan yield against deposit cost. If deposits keep lagging, the re-rate to 1.9 times book is earned and extends. If deposit costs catch up, 1.9x becomes a peak multiple sitting on peak margins, the worst pairing there is. The left tail, a Japanese downturn hitting the book mid-reprice, is real but survivable, with equity near ¥11 trillion and bad loans at 0.70%. The fatter tail is the milder one, plain multiple compression, because you are paying the top of a twelve-year range for a margin that arithmetic puts closer to peak than trough. A slide back toward the old 0.7 to 1.0 times book would roughly halve the equity with earnings flat.
The bet is still that Japan stays off zero and Mizuho's loans keep out-earning its deposits by a widening gap. What breaks it is the day cost of deposits rises as fast as loan yields, and the pair that tells you first is return on loans against cost of deposits, quarter over quarter. If that spread prints flat or lower next quarter while you are paying 1.9 times book, the market handed you the peak and called it a compounder.
Methodology
The year-to-date row is the sum of the 1 reported quarters of the current fiscal year, diluted EPS included; the five-quarter and five-year tables are the vendor income statements.
Sector frame: banks lens, read on tangible book and the return on it, not on P/E.
Data gaps: Japanese foreign private issuer, so quarterly detail comes from 6-K furnishings, not SEC XBRL. The vendor's fiscal 2022 and 2023 net income and revenue tags read as negative or too low and conflict with Mizuho's actual reported profits both years, so this run excludes them and builds the trend on the reliable net-interest-income, margin, credit and capital series.
Definition note: FY3/2026 profit shown at about ¥1.16 trillion on the vendor tag, which runs above the company's profit-attributable-to-owners basis, a minority-interest and definition gap.
Bundle: MFG context bundle, current reported quarter Q1 FY3/2027 (period ended Jun 30, 2026), 6-K filed Sep 1, 2026.
Fact check: All numerical financials (net interest income, margin components, NPL ratio, provisions, loans, equity, buybacks) reconciled to company 6-K filings dated Jul 30, 2026 and SEC XBRL annual data. Price, P/E, and P/TBV verified against vendor quote as of Sep 6, 2026. Deposit base updated to ¥61.6T per Jun 2026 6-K (filed figure more precise than "roughly ¥60T"). The 26% gain over 200-day average is derived from price $11.23 vs 200-day average $8.90. Insider activity confirmed zero buys/sells in trailing 12 months. Forward P/E estimate for FY3/27 not included; consensus data in evidence pack covers only FY3/29 and FY3/30. Final analysis verified as of Sep 6, 2026.
Bid Cap
Daily ideas, a 390-name database, and a model long/short book from an investor who mostly covers financials. $70 a month or $700 a year.
Subscribe on Substack


