MTCompany report
MasTec, Inc. MTZ
The bet you're really making is that America keeps spending heavily to build and fix the wires, pipes, and towers that carry its power, gas, and internet, and that MasTec is the crew hired to do it. You're betting that after a bad stretch in 2022 and 2023, when it overpaid for companies and its profits vanished, it now runs the jobs well enough that the work makes money again. Right now it is going well: the biggest sales quarter in its history, up 23%, with profit up 52% as newer power and grid work replaces old pipeline jobs. You pay about 38 times the last year's earnings, a high number only because profit is still climbing back from the loss it posted in 2023.
Key data
MTZ · price with moving averages
Source: market data.
The business
MasTec is a hired construction and maintenance crew for the country's physical networks. It strings and buries the high-voltage line utilities use to move electricity (Power Delivery), builds the pipelines and gas plants energy companies run (Oil and Gas), erects wind and solar farms and civil works (Clean Energy and Infrastructure), and hangs the towers and fiber that carry phone and broadband signal (Communications). The customer is a utility, a pipeline operator, or a telecom, and what they buy is a completed project on a fixed schedule, plus the maintenance and storm-restoration work that follows. The company holds no product and owns little; the asset is 37,000 workers, a national fleet, and the relationships and bonding capacity that let it win multi-year utility programs a smaller contractor cannot. That scale, and the skilled crews that are genuinely scarce, is the moat, and it is a modest one: this is a low-margin trade where a single mispriced job can erase a quarter.
The numbers
The recovery is the whole story, and it runs in one direction. Revenue has compounded through the downturn while profit collapsed and is now snapping back.
| Quarter | Revenue | Net income | Diluted EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 2025 | $3.5B | $85.8M | $1.09 |
| Q3 2025 | $4.0B | $160.7M | $2.04 |
| Q4 2025 | $3.9B | $142.7M | $1.81 |
| Q1 2026 | $3.8B | $69.7M | $0.77 |
| Q2 2026 | $4.4B | $130.1M | $1.65 |
Q1 is always the soft quarter for a construction calendar, so the $0.77 print is seasonal, not a stall. What matters is Q2: revenue grew 23% against the year before while operating profit grew 45%, meaning every new dollar of work dropped more than its share to the operating line. That is the operating leverage the entire case rests on, and it shows up plainly across the fiscal years.
| Fiscal year | Revenue | Operating income | Op. margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | $9.8B | $125.1M | 1.3% |
| 2023 | $12.0B | $152.0M | 1.3% |
| 2024 | $12.3B | $436.4M | 3.5% |
| 2025 | $14.3B | $652.6M | 4.6% |
| 2026, 1H | $8.2B | $368.0M | 4.5% |
The inflection quarter was late 2023, when the pipeline and clean-energy jobs that had bled margin worked through the book and pricing discipline returned. The margin sequence since then is the point: the same revenue base earns three times what it did two years ago, and the mix is shifting toward grid and power work tied to data-center electricity demand, which is where the higher-margin, less-cyclical dollars sit. The margin question flagged as the thing to watch a few weeks back has held rather than broken: the Q2 operating margin reached 5.2% against 4.4% a year earlier, the direction intact, though the shift is still early and 2026 has not yet cleared the full-year 2025 rate.
The cash tells a colder version. Free cash flow was $286M in 2025 against $399M of reported profit, a 0.72x conversion, because a contractor growing this fast pours cash into receivables and job costs before it collects. In 2024 the working capital ran the other way and free cash flow reached $973M. That swing is the honest read: the earnings are real, but the cash behind them arrives in lumps, and at today's price the free-cash-flow yield is only about 1.3%. What this memo believes that the tape does not is that the grid and power mix normalizes margins above the old cyclical range; the print that settles it is free cash flow tracking net income over a full year, not a single strong quarter.
Management
Jose Ramon Mas has run this as a founder-family operator, and the record is mixed rather than clean. The scars are self-inflicted: the 2021 and 2022 acquisitions of clean-energy and pipeline businesses were bought near a peak and delivered the margin collapse that followed, a pattern of paying up and digesting slowly that any future deal should be read against. Against that, the buyback has been small and the share count crept up 3.3% over three years, so shareholders funded some of the recovery through dilution rather than being handed it. The 2025 repurchase of $77M was done near an average price of $169, well below today's $237, which reads as opportunistic and correct. Insiders sold about $9.3M over the last year with no open-market buys, a director and an officer the largest sellers; small against a $19B company, but not the picture of a team that thinks the stock is cheap.
How it fails or surprises you
Data-center power demand (right tail). The Power Delivery and Clean Energy segments connect the grid to new load, and AI data centers are the largest new load in a generation. If that interconnection spend accelerates, MasTec's highest-margin work grows fastest and normalized margins settle above the 5% the market is underwriting. The print that reveals it first is segment backlog and margin in Power Delivery, quarter over quarter.
The 2022 rerun. This is a fixed-price contractor with a live history of a single program going wrong. A large pipeline or clean-energy job that runs over cost would show up as gross margin dropping before revenue does, and would reset the whole recovery narrative. One bad project, not a bad economy, is the fatter near-term risk.
The cash that isn't there yet. Net income more than doubled, but free cash flow covered only 72% of it last year while the stock trades at 38 times earnings and yields barely 1% in cash. If working capital keeps absorbing the growth, the profit recovery is partly on paper, and that is the fact this memo's read explains least well.
Closing thoughts
This is an uncertainty a named print resolves, not an exposure you only survive. The market is paying a full multiple for a low-margin contractor on the belief that margins keep climbing and the grid buildout is durable; the two prints that convert that belief into fact are a full year of free cash flow tracking earnings and Power Delivery margin holding its gain. If both land, the earnings power justifies the multiple and the mix shift extends it. If free cash flow keeps lagging or a project breaks, the stock is expensive against cash the business does not reliably produce, and the 40% it already fell from its 52-week high is a reminder of how fast this name derates. The left tail is a cost-overrun quarter; the right tail is a structurally higher-margin grid business the market still prices as cyclical pipeline work. On judgment, the right tail is the fatter one here, but only for a holder willing to wait through the lumpy cash.
The bet is still that America keeps building and fixing the wires, pipes, and towers, and that MasTec is the crew that gets paid to do it and now keeps some of the money. What breaks it is a single project going bad or cash that never catches up to profit, and the one pair of numbers that tells you first is free cash flow against net income over the next four quarters.
Methodology
Sector frame: infrastructure construction (industrials). Anchored to MasTec's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2026 and the fiscal 2025 Form 10-K, with income, cash-flow and share figures taken as filed. Operating income for 1H 2026 and incremental margins are derived from filed subtotals and labelled as such. Segment mix and backlog are company-published measures and read qualitatively where a current filed figure was not pulled this run. Price, 52-week range and multiples are vendor-sourced market data as of Sep 5, 2026. Documentation prepared with AI assistance. Not investment advice.
Fact check: bundle financials reconciled to FMP; all quarterly and annual figures, ratios, and growth rates verified against ground-truth data. CEO name verified against FMP profile. 0 errors. Final analysis verified as of Sep 6, 2026.
Bid Cap
Daily ideas, a 390-name database, and a model long/short book from an investor who mostly covers financials. $70 a month or $700 a year.
Subscribe on Substack


