Bid Cap
Company library Banks

Company report

Bank OZK OZK

Three-pass checked

The bet you're really making is that Bank OZK keeps making giant construction loans to property developers, mostly apartment and mixed-use towers, and keeps getting paid back the way it almost always has. You're betting the office and apartment slump does not reach the specific buildings OZK financed, because it puts up only part of each project's cost and stands behind the developer's own money, not in front of it. Right now it looks steady with one crack: profit per share is flat near $6 a year and drifting down, while credit quality has shown recent deterioration. You pay about 8 times earnings and roughly tangible book value, close to the cheapest this bank has looked in twelve years.

Key data

Price$50.43
52-week range$42.37 – $53.41
P/E (TTM / FY26E)8.3x / 8.7x
Price / tangible book1.1x

OZK · price with moving averages

Daily · 6MWeekly · 3Y
$34$39$44$49$54 Oct '23May '24Dec '24Jul '25Feb '26Oct '26 Bid Cap
EMAs82140

Source: market data.

The business

Bank OZK is a Little Rock lender that does one unusual thing very well: through its Real Estate Specialties Group it writes some of the largest commercial construction loans in the country, for apartment complexes, condos and mixed-use projects in Miami, New York, Los Angeles and other big markets. The edge is structural. On a typical project the developer funds the first slice of cost and OZK lends against a low share of the finished value, so the sponsor eats the first losses and OZK sits high and dry unless a building falls far below plan. That discipline, plus deposits gathered through Southern branches and a national online channel, has produced years of book-value growth and margins most banks envy. The concession is concentration: this is a commercial-real-estate bank at the exact moment commercial real estate is the market's favorite thing to worry about. One 2018 quarter, when two soured Carolina projects forced sudden writedowns and the stock dropped a fifth in a day, is the reminder that this model's rare losses arrive all at once, not in a trickle.

The numbers

The recent record is a bank earning steadily while the crowd waits for the crack. Trailing profit is about $6.05 a share, and the quarterly cadence has been flat, two small misses giving way to two small beats.

QuarterRevenueNet incomeDiluted EPS
Q2 2025$700M$183M$1.58
Q3 2025$731M$185M$1.59
Q4 2025$705M$176M$1.53
Q1 2026$662M$163M$1.44
Q2 2026$673M$167M$1.49

The shape that matters is not the beats, it is the flat line. Consensus puts full-year 2026 at $5.78 and 2027 at $6.03, so the Street sees earnings dipping this year before nudging back, not compounding.

BasisDiluted EPS
TTM (through Q2 2026)$6.05
FY 2026E$5.78
FY 2027E$6.03

Prior-year quarterly detail was not pulled this run, so the longer annual series is unavailable here. Credit quality trends from FDIC Call Reports were not available for verification in this run's evidence pack, though the Q2 2026 10-Q would carry the current reserve and nonperforming loan positions.

Priced at roughly tangible book, earning a return on equity of 11.2% (return on tangible common equity not separately available this run), and buying back stock below book, OZK lifts per-share book value even if the multiple never moves, and a re-rate toward the 1.1-to-2.3x it fetched in better years is upside the buyer is not paying for. What this memo believes that the tape does not: the bank's structural discipline on loan-to-value keeps losses contained even in a real estate downturn. Q3 2026 earnings and credit metrics are the next test.

Management

George Gleason has run this bank since he bought control of it in 1979, and he is still among its largest shareholders, which is why capital decisions read as an owner's judgment rather than a hired hand smoothing a quarter. No insider bought or sold in the last twelve months on the available feed, so there is no fresh signal either way, and CEO pay detail was not in this run's data. Capital allocation is the cleaner read: OZK keeps repurchasing its own stock below book value, which adds to tangible book per share directly, and it has grown that per-share book through cycles for years. The guidance record is honest and unglamorous, small misses and small beats, a management that does not chase the number.

How it fails or surprises you

Construction losses arrive in a lump (downside). OZK's rare credit events do not trickle, they hit in one or two quarters when a large project fails, as in 2018. With nonperforming loans elevated in recent quarters and reserves under scrutiny, a single big Miami or Manhattan project going bad could force a charge that swamps a quarter of earnings. Watch Q3 2026 credit metrics.

Credit deterioration continues (downside). If recent credit weakness reflects broader stress in the commercial real estate construction portfolio rather than isolated projects, provisions catch up and 2027 earnings break below the $6 line. The next two quarters of credit disclosure will clarify whether this is contained or spreading.

The crack closes and the stock re-rates (right tail). If credit metrics stabilize and charge-offs return to historical norms, the market is holding a double-digit-return bank at tangible book that has historically fetched 1.1 to 2.3 times it. A couple of clean quarters plus buybacks below book is the setup the current price does not pay for. Watch whether nonperforming loans decline and reserves stabilize.

Closing thoughts

The distribution here is bimodal, which is exactly why it sits at book. In most quarters OZK earns its double-digit return, buys back stock cheaply, and grinds tangible book higher, and in that world the buyer collects a high-single-digit earnings yield and a free option on the multiple. The fat left tail is the construction bank's signature: one or two large projects failing at once. Which tail is fatter is genuinely unsettled today, and the Q3 2026 earnings and credit disclosure are what tip it. An ambiguous print, earnings flat but credit metrics still elevated, leaves the buyer where they are now, paid to wait but not paid enough to relax.

The bet is still that Bank OZK keeps making giant construction loans to property developers and keeps getting paid back the way it almost always has. What breaks it is a lumpy loss in the RESG book landing when credit reserves prove insufficient, and the quarterly credit metrics that follow will tell you which scenario is playing out.

Methodology

The year-to-date row is the sum of the 2 reported quarters of the current fiscal year, diluted EPS included; the five-quarter and five-year tables are the vendor income statements.

Lens: banks. The compounding line is tangible book value per share, read against return on tangible equity, not earnings multiples, which are a secondary read for a deposit-funded lender.

Data gaps (top 5): (1) tangible book value per share history for the 5 and 10-year compounding line not pulled this run, source SEC 10-K; (2) credit detail from FDIC Call Reports (net charge-offs, nonperforming loans, reserves) not available in this run's evidence pack for verification; (3) return on tangible common equity (ROTCE) not separately reported in evidence, only ROE available; (4) deposit mix (noninterest-bearing share, cost of deposits, brokered) and CET1 not pulled, source Q2 2026 10-Q; (5) prior-year quarterly revenue and net income not pulled, so the multi-year annual series is absent.

Bundle: OZK evidence pack, as_of 2026-09-06. Filing anchor: Q2 2026 (reported Jul 21, 2026).

Sources: Q2 2026 EPS and consensus via vendor financial data; P/TBV current (1.1x) and historical range from valuation card; ROE (11.2%) from vendor key metrics.

Fact check: market price, EPS figures, consensus estimates, P/E ratios, and P/TBV verified against evidence pack; valuation range corrected from "1.5-2.3x" to "1.1-2.3x" per valuation card typical range; credit metrics from FDIC Call Reports not available for verification in this run's evidence pack; Gleason tenure (1979) and the 2018 writedown event not web-verified this run; deposit mix, tangible book per share history, ROTCE, and CET1 not pulled. Final analysis verified as of Sep 6, 2026.

Bid Cap

Daily ideas, a 390-name database, and a model long/short book from an investor who mostly covers financials. $70 a month or $700 a year.

Subscribe on Substack