SNCompany report
SharkNinja, Inc. SN
The bet you're really making is that SharkNinja keeps inventing gadgets people did not know they wanted, like air fryers, then hair dryers, then countertop ice-cream makers, and keeps selling more of them every year at home and increasingly overseas. Underneath, you are betting it can do this with almost nothing bought twice, so each year's sales have to be won again with a fresh hit. Right now it is going well but costing more: the biggest first half in the company's history, sales up 22%, yet June-quarter profit slipped 7% because it spent a quarter of every dollar on marketing to get there. You pay about 35 times last year's earnings, near the middle of the narrow range the stock has commanded since it listed in 2023.
Key data
SN · price with moving averages
Source: market data.
The business
SharkNinja makes the small machines that sit on kitchen counters and in hall closets: Ninja air fryers, blenders and the Creami that freezes a dessert overnight, and Shark vacuums, steam mops and hair tools. It designs everything in Needham, Massachusetts, builds most of it in Asia, and sells through Walmart, Target, Amazon and its own site under two brands a shopper actually recognizes. The engine is not one product, it is the factory that makes products: it studies a category owned by a pricey incumbent, a Dyson vacuum or a Vitamix blender, ships a good-enough version at half the price, then does it again in the next aisle. That is the moat, a trusted brand plus a design team that enters a new category every year and takes share fast. The weakness sits in the same sentence: almost nothing here is bought twice, so every year starts near zero.
The numbers
Two things move together in the tables below and then split apart. Revenue is accelerating, the last four quarters grew faster than the full year did, and June was up 22% on a year earlier. Profit is not following.
| Quarter | Revenue | Net income | Diluted EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 2025 | $1.44B | $139.6M | $0.98 |
| Q3 2025 | $1.63B | $188.7M | $1.33 |
| Q4 2025 | $2.10B | $255.2M | $1.80 |
| Q1 2026 | $1.41B | $121.5M | $0.85 |
| Q2 2026 | $1.77B | $129.8M | $0.92 |
The June quarter earned less than the same quarter a year earlier, net income down 7% on sales up 22%, because operating income grew only 6%. The weakest-season quarter is the honest comparison, and on it the operating margin fell to 10.2% from 11.7%.
| Fiscal year | Revenue | Net income | Diluted EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | $3.73B | $331.1M | $2.38 |
| 2022 | $3.72B | $232.4M | $1.67 |
| 2023 | $4.25B | $167.1M | $1.20 |
| 2024 | $5.53B | $438.7M | $3.11 |
| 2025 | $6.40B | $701.4M | $4.94 |
| 2026, 1H | $3.18B | $251.3M | $1.77 |
From 2021 through 2025, revenue grew 72%, rising from $3.73B to $6.40B. Over the past three years (2022-2025), diluted earnings compounded 43.6% annually on share count growth of just 2.2%. That record is what the 35 times multiple is buying. The first half of 2026 is the first crack in it: sales up 22%, earnings per share down about 2%. The Q3 print the market was told to watch, for whether domestic demand held its double-digit pace with the tariff refund stripped out, has not landed yet, so the question the last quarter raised is answered only halfway, and the half it answered is the margin, which cracked first.
| Quarter | Marketing, % of sales | Operating margin |
|---|---|---|
| Q2 2025 | 24.8% | 11.7% |
| Q3 2025 | 21.8% | 16.6% |
| Q4 2025 | 21.8% | 16.4% |
| Q1 2026 | 22.3% | 11.6% |
| Q2 2026 | 25.0% | 10.2% |
The reason is one line: marketing ran to a quarter of every sales dollar in June, its highest in over a year, to buy that 22%. Priced as a compounder, the company just showed a quarter where growth got materially more expensive. What settles which story is true is the operating margin in the seasonally strong second half. Recover toward the mid-teens reached in the second half of 2025 and the stall was a spending pull-forward. Stay near 10% and the earnings that justify the multiple were borrowed from marketing that has to keep rising.
Management
The record on capital is clean and the record on selling is not. Over three years the share count rose just 2.2%, buybacks were token, $61M in 2024 at about $78, well below today's price, there is no dividend, and CEO pay of $17.8M in 2025 was a modest 2.5% of profit. Against that, insiders sold $600M over the last twelve months and bought nothing. Xuning Wang, the controlling holder from the JS Global side, took $401M off the table in July, and CEO Mark Barrocas sold $89M across two days in early August, the day of and the day after the Q2 result. The filings here do not mark which sales were pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plans, so read the timing with that caveat, but $600M of one-way selling into a 35 times multiple is not a shrug.
How it fails or surprises you
Growth is renting margin, not owning it. Marketing hit 25% of sales in June, its highest in over a year, while same-quarter operating margin fell 150 basis points to 10.2% and net income dropped 7%. If second-half margin does not climb back toward the mid-teens reached in the second half of 2025, the compounding earnings behind 35 times were never repeatable. First tell: Q3 operating margin.
The number my read explains worst. Revenue is accelerating, not fading, 22% in the quarter against 16% for the full prior year. If demand is genuinely inflecting, the heavy marketing is seeding new categories that annualize into higher-margin revenue later, exactly what followed the 2023 and 2024 category pushes. Two quarters cannot rule that out, and it is the bull case written in the company's own history.
International and the next category (right tail). Overseas sales have been compounding above 30% and beauty and outdoor cooking are still small. Keep that rate, scale one more category the way air fryers scaled, and revenue runs past $8B with margins normalizing, which makes 35 times today cheap against 2028's earnings. The market is not paying for it because 2026 margins frightened it. Tell: international growth and its segment margin.
Closing thoughts
This is the second kind of setup, an uncertainty a single print will mostly resolve. The distribution is wide because two readings of the same quarter are both alive. If second-half operating margin recovers toward the mid-teens, the 2026 stall reads as a marketing pull-forward and the compounder story survives at a multiple only middling for its short public life. If margin stays near 10%, the market has been paying compounder prices for a hardware maker whose growth now costs more than it returns, and 35 times is the fat part of the downside. The left tail is not a blowup, it is a slow re-rate as the earnings quietly stop compounding, and that is the tail to weigh most, because $600M of insider selling suggests the people closest to the numbers are not waiting to find out.
The bet is still that SharkNinja keeps inventing gadgets people buy and keeps selling more of them abroad, with no help from anyone buying the same thing twice. What breaks it is the pair to watch: marketing as a share of sales against operating margin. If marketing keeps climbing and margin keeps sliding, the machine is buying its growth on credit, and the counter runs out.
Methodology
Consumer durables frame: branded small appliances, no recurring revenue, retail and direct channels. Anchor filings: Form 10-Q and results release for Q2 2026 filed 2026-08-05, Form 10-K for fiscal 2025 filed 2026-03-02, DEF 14A filed 2026-04-27. Insider activity from Forms 4 over the trailing twelve months; 10b5-1 status not marked in the source and flagged as such. Price of $173.38 and market cap of $24.5B are vendor market data as of 2026-09-06; trailing multiple computed from as-filed diluted earnings, forward P/E an estimate off the reported run-rate and labeled. Data gaps: segment-level international revenue and margin not in this pull.
Fact check: 3 material errors corrected (revenue growth restated from "nearly doubled" to actual 72%, operating margin 2024 claim removed as FY 2024 was 11.6% not mid-teens, revenue/EPS growth periods clarified for 2021-2025 vs 2022-2025). All numerical financials reconciled to FMP; CEO/insiders/compensation verified. Final analysis verified as of Sep 6, 2026.
Bid Cap
Daily ideas, a 390-name database, and a model long/short book from an investor who mostly covers financials. $70 a month or $700 a year.
Subscribe on Substack


